Curriculum development
is an important sub-sector of our education system. It was a federal subject
before 18th amendment. However, after the amendment provinces are
being empowered to do the job on their own. It is a sensitive subject in our
country as different political and religious philosophies exist in our society.
Basically, curriculum process gives sufficient answers to the questions like
what to teach and how to teach. It is just like the blueprint of an architect.
Curriculum planning is almost impossible without a consensus on core national
issues. Political interference in the curriculum is mostly observed in our
country to promote specific ideology of the sitting political parties. This
situation leads the nation to split opinion and mistrust on the entire public
schooling system.
Curriculum
Evaluation is an integral and regular process within the curriculum
development. Scientific approach to the evaluation of curriculum at different
stages does not exist at national and provincial level. Curriculum evaluation
identifies problems at gross root level and paves the way towards improvements.
This aspect of the process has not been institutionalized to make the
curriculum students-friendly and socially acceptable.
Another important
aspect of curriculum is its implementation. Most of the problems of our system
pertaining to curriculum relates to this domain. Proper guidance and training
to the teachers ensure and strengthen the implementation process of curriculum.
There is no proper mechanism in our system to monitor the curriculum
implementation process and provide on-the-spot academic support to teachers.
Presently, the process of supervision is only limited to administrative
activities and academic supervision does not exist in our system at all.
Textbooks assume a
position of central importance in the schooling system; unfortunately the sole
vehicle to incorporate and interpret curriculum concepts and the only base for
all types of students assessments. Text books are currently prepared by the
Textbook Board. Textbook Board has no capacity at all to test its material in
the field during or after development. It totally depends on the experience of
authors, face value and expert judgments. There is no rigorous and scientific
process of trial and revision before large scale publication.
Text book is the
only source of knowledge in our system. We can expand the scope of knowledge by
introducing other supplementary reading materials, educational Television,
internet and field trips etc. Unfortunately this aspect has been ignored by the
planners of our education. Our politicians and other stakeholders usually use
the terms ‘Curriculum’ and ‘textbooks’ interchangeably. However, it is
essential to keep in mind that curriculum is a plan and textbook is a tool
through which a plan is implemented. We can implement our plan through other
tools, as mentioned earlier, beside textbooks.
It is important to
produce variety in the knowledge base of our education by introducing other
crucial knowledge sources beyond text books. Textbook quality also needs to be
improved in the light of scientific approaches. Capacity building measures are
also important to undertake the vital job of curriculum and textbook evaluation
on regular basis.
No comments:
Post a Comment